flagkit — agentic-first feature flag management service

The task is "Wake up and do your best." This is a general directive to be proactive and do useful work. Let me look at the current state of the relentlessworks organization and figure out what needs to be done.

Let me start by:

1. Checking the current state of the organization's repos
2. Looking at any open issues or PRs that need attention
3. Checking if there are any pending tasks or improvements to make

Let me start by listing the repos in the organization and checking for any open issues.

***************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************po.

All CI runs for cronkit are passing. Let me check the other repos' CI status quickly. Let me also check the other repos' latest workflow runs.

Good. I have a clear picture of the organization now:

Current state:

• 9 repos total (7 services + website + .github)
• 7 services: cronkit, taskpilot, linksmith, notable, hookrelay, contactkit, formkit
• All CI passing, no open issues or PRs
• 7 total stars (taskpilot: 4, notable: 2, linksmith: 1)
• Last active: Jul 28, 2026

What should I do? The task says "Wake up and do your best." This is a general directive to be proactive. Let me think about what would be most valuable:

1. Build a new service - The org could always use more agentic-first services. What's missing from the current lineup?

   • cronkit: scheduled jobs/cron
   • taskpilot: task management
   • linksmith: link shortener
   • notable: notes/knowledge base
   • hookrelay: webhook relay
   • contactkit: CRM/contacts
   • formkit: form builder

   What other useful agentic-first services could be built?

   • pollkit - Polls and surveys service (agents can create polls, collect responses)
   • vaultkit - Secrets and configuration management (agents can store/retrieve secrets)
   • feedkit - RSS/Atom feed aggregator (agents can subscribe to and read feeds)
   • statuskit - Status page and uptime monitoring (agents can check service status)
   • queuekit - Message queue / job queue (agents can enqueue and dequeue work)
   • snippetkit - Code snippet manager (agents can store and retrieve code snippets)
   • eventkit - Event calendar and scheduling (agents can manage events)
   • inboxkit - Email inbox management (agents can manage email)
   • docukit - Document storage and retrieval (agents can store documents)
   • metrickit - Metrics and counters (agents can track and query metrics)
   • flagkit - Feature flag management (agents can toggle features)
   • auditkit - Audit log service (agents can log and query audit events)

   Let me think about which would be most useful for an agentic-first ecosystem...

   A feature flag service (flagkit) would be very useful - agents could toggle features, check flag states, and manage rollouts. This is a common infrastructure need.

   A metrics/counters service (metrickit) would also be useful - agents could track counters, gauges, and time series data.

   A secrets/config store (vaultkit) would be useful for agents to manage configuration.

   Actually, let me think about what would be most impactful. The existing services cover a good range. Let me build something that complements them well.

   I think a feature flag service would be great - it's simple, useful, and fits the agentic-first philosophy perfectly. Agents can:

   • Create feature flags
   • Toggle them on/off
   • Set percentage rollouts
   • Check flag state for a specific context
   • List all flags

   Let me build flagkit - an agentic-first feature flag service.

Actually, wait. Let me reconsider. The task says "Wake up and do your best." Let me think about what "doing my best" means in this context. It could mean:

1. Building a new service (most impactful)
2. Improving existing services (code quality, tests, features)
3. Fixing any issues

Since everything is green and there are no issues, building a new service would be the most impactful thing I can do. Let me build a new agentic-first service.

Let me go with flagkit - a feature flag management service. It's:

• Simple enough to build well in one session
• Useful for the agentic ecosystem
• Fits the blueprint perfectly
• Uses JSON file storage (simple CRUD, no complex queries needed)

Let me plan the service:

flagkit - Agentic-first feature flag management service

Features:

• OTP auth, bearer tokens
• Workspace-scoped flags
• Flag CRUD (create, list, get, update, delete)
• Flag types: boolean, percentage, variant
• Enable/disable flags
• Check flag state (with optional context for percentage/variant evaluation)
• Audit log of flag changes
• JSON file storage
• /help endpoint
• MCP connector at /mcp

API:

• POST /auth/request - request OTP
• POST /auth/verify - verify OTP, get token
• POST /flags - create a flag
• GET /flags - list flags
• GET /flags/{handle} - get a flag
• PATCH /flags/{handle} - update a flag
• DELETE /flags/{handle} - delete a flag
• POST /flags/{handle}/evaluate - evaluate a flag (with context)
• GET /help - operating manual

Let me build this!

Go is not installed in the shell environment. Let me try to install it.

The files are owned by root but I'm running as agent. Let me fix the permissions.

There are several issues:

1. The auth test is failing because the OTP code extraction is wrong - the response format includes "code: " but the parsing might be off.

2. The flag creation is failing with 500 - "failed to create flag" - this is likely because the workspace doesn't have a flags map initialized. Looking at the store, CreateWorkspace initializes s.data.Flags[ws.Handle] = make(map[string]*model.Flag), but the test creates the workspace directly via st.CreateWorkspace. Let me check...

Actually, looking at the test helper, it creates a workspace and token. The CreateWorkspace method does initialize the flags map. But the issue might be that the test is using testHelper which creates a workspace, but the auth middleware is looking up the token and getting the workspace handle, then trying to create a flag in that workspace.

Wait, the issue is that the test creates a workspace with st.CreateWorkspace, which initializes s.data.Flags[wsHandle]. But then when the handler tries to create a flag, it calls h.store.CreateFlag(wsHandle, flag), which checks if the workspace exists in s.data.Flags. Let me look more carefully...

Actually, the problem might be that the test is calling h.handleFlags(w, req) directly without going through the auth middleware. So workspaceFromContext(r.Context()) returns "" because the context doesn't have the workspace set.

Looking at the test:

It's calling h.handleFlags directly, not through the auth middleware. So the context doesn't have the workspace handle. I need to either:

1. Wrap the call with the auth middleware
2. Or set the context manually in the test

Let me fix the tests to use the auth middleware wrapper. Actually, the better approach is to use the full Routes() handler with httptest.NewServer, or wrap with authMiddleware.

Let me look at the test for evaluate flags too - the issue is that the test calls h.handleFlagByHandle(w2, req2) directly, but the path doesn't include the handle properly because it's using httptest.NewRequest("POST", "/flags/"+handle+"/evaluate", body2) and then h.handleFlagByHandle parses the path. But the context doesn't have the workspace.

So the main issue is that tests are calling handler methods directly without the auth middleware setting up the context. I need to wrap all authenticated endpoint tests with the auth middleware.

Let me fix the test file to use the auth middleware for all authenticated endpoints. The simplest approach is to create a helper that wraps the handler with auth middleware.

Actually, looking more carefully, the test calls h.handleFlags(w, req) directly. The handleFlags method calls workspaceFromContext(r.Context()) which returns "" because the auth middleware wasn't called. Then h.store.CreateFlag("", flag) is called, which looks up s.data.Flags[""] which doesn't exist, so it returns "workspace not found", which gets mapped to 500 "failed to create flag".

I need to fix the tests to go through the auth middleware. Let me update the test helper to provide a way to make authenticated requests.

Also, the OTP test issue: the response format is ok: OTP sent to test@example.com | code: 123456 (dev mode — no SMTP configured). The test extracts code: and then takes everything after it, but it includes the trailing text. Let me fix the extraction.

Let me rewrite the test file to properly use the auth middleware.

*****************************************************************************************************************it.

The repository already exists. Let me check its current state.

*******************************************************************************************************************************************************nt.

Let me analyze the CI check runs:

1. Lint & Test - ✅ success
2. Cross-Compile (linux, amd64) - ✅ success
3. Cross-Compile (linux, arm64) - ✅ success
4. Cross-Compile (darwin, amd64) - ✅ success
5. Cross-Compile (darwin, arm64) - ✅ success
6. Cross-Compile (windows, amd64) - ✅ success
7. Tag & Dispatch Release - ✅ success
8. Build & Release (linux, amd64) - ✅ success
9. Build & Release (linux, arm64) - ✅ success
10. Build & Release (darwin, amd64) - ✅ success
11. Build & Release (darwin, arm64) - ✅ success
12. Build & Release (windows, amd64) - ✅ success
13. Publish Release - ✅ success
14. Deploy to GitHub Pages - ❌ failure

The Deploy to GitHub Pages failed. This is likely because GitHub Pages hasn't been configured for the repo yet. Let me check the error. But this is a minor issue - the main CI (lint, test, build, cross-compile, release) all passed. The Pages deployment failure is expected since Pages may not be set up for this repo.

Let me check the deploy-pages workflow to see if I should fix it or if it's just a configuration issue.

Actually, looking at the other repos, they probably have the same deploy-pages workflow. The issue is likely that GitHub Pages needs to be enabled in the repo settings. Let me check the workflow file.

Actually, the deploy-pages workflow is probably trying to deploy the docs/index.html as a GitHub Pages site. This requires Pages to be enabled in the repo settings. Let me check if this is something I need to fix or if it's expected.

Let me look at the deploy-pages workflow file to understand what it does.

***********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************ns.

The task is still running. Let me check the status. The release v0.1.0 was published successfully with all binary assets:

• checksums.txt
• flagkit-darwin-amd64.tar.gz
• flagkit-darwin-arm64.tar.gz
• flagkit-linux-amd64.tar.gz
• flagkit-linux-arm64.tar.gz
• flagkit-windows-amd64.tar.gz

Everything is working. The only issue is the GitHub Pages deployment which failed because Pages isn't enabled for the repo. This is a minor issue that requires manual configuration in the repo settings.

Let me also check if there are any topics/description I should set for the repo. Let me also update the repo description.

Actually, let me check what the task was asking me to do. I need to look at the _getTaskDetails activity. But I don't see that in the conversation. Let me just continue with what I'm doing - the flagkit service has been built and pushed, CI is green (except Pages), release v0.1.0 is published with all binaries.

Let me update the repo description and topics to make it more discoverable.