Fix GitHub Release Workflows Across Repositories
Messages
The messages exchanged in this conversation.
- Created
A new turn starts now. Fetch the current task details and execute the steps in the enclosed instructions.
- Created activity call _getTaskDetails
- Created
The task is "Wake up and do your best." This is a general directive to be proactive and do useful work for the relentlessworks organization. Let me look at the current state of things and figure out what needs to be done.
From the last execution, all CIs were passing and the progress website was updated. Let me check the current state of the organization - look at repos, check for any issues, check CI status, and see if there's anything that needs attention.
Let me start by:
- Checking the organization's repos
- Checking for any open issues
- Checking CI status across repos
- Looking at the progress website to see current state
Let me do several things in parallel.
- Commented
************************************************************************************************************************us.
- Created
Let me check the CI status of all the Go repos and also check for any open issues. Let me also look at the progress website to understand the current state.
The repos are:
- cronkit (Go) - created Jul 24, pushed Jul 25
- formkit (Go) - created Jul 23, pushed Jul 23
- website (JavaScript) - created Jul 21, pushed Jul 22
- .github - org profile
- contactkit (Go) - created Jul 21, pushed Jul 21
- hookrelay (Go) - created Jul 1, pushed Jul 21
- taskpilot (Go) - created Jun 26, pushed Jul 21, 4 stars
- notable (Go) - created Jun 28, pushed Jul 21, 2 stars
- linksmith (Go) - created Jun 25, pushed Jul 21, 1 star
So we have 9 repos total, 7 Go services (cronkit, formkit, contactkit, hookrelay, taskpilot, notable, linksmith), 1 website, and 1 .github profile.
Let me check CI status for all the Go repos and check for any open issues across the org.
- Commented
******************************************************************************************************************es.
- Created
********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************os.
- Commented
I see formkit has failing workflows (Release and Deploy Pages). Let me check the other repos' CI status and also look at the formkit failures more closely.
- Created
Let me summarize the CI status:
- cronkit - CI: success, Tag & Release: success ✅
- formkit - Release: failure ❌, Deploy Pages: failure ❌ (no CI workflow run visible - only 4 total runs, and the latest 2 are failures)
- contactkit - CI: success ✅, Release: failure ❌
- hookrelay - CI: success ✅, Tag Release: success ✅
- taskpilot - CI: success ✅, Tag Release: success ✅
- notable - CI: success ✅, Tag Release: success ✅
- linksmith - CI: success ✅, Tag Release: success ✅
So the issues are:
- formkit: Release workflow failed, Deploy Pages workflow failed
- contactkit: Release workflow failed
The Release failures are likely because the release workflow tries to create a GitHub release but there's no tag, or some other issue. The Deploy Pages failure for formkit is likely because GitHub Pages isn't configured or the docs/ directory doesn't have the right structure.
Let me look at the formkit workflow files to understand the failures. Let me also check if formkit has a CI workflow that passed.
Actually, looking at the formkit runs more carefully - there are only 4 total runs, and the latest 2 are failures (Release and Deploy Pages). Let me check if there's a CI workflow that ran.
Let me look at the formkit workflows and the contactkit release workflow to understand the failures. Let me also check the formkit CI status.
Actually, looking at the formkit data more carefully:
- total_count: 4
- The 2 most recent runs are: Release (failure, workflow_dispatch) and Deploy Pages (failure, push)
- There are 2 more runs that I didn't see (per_page=2 only showed 2)
Let me get more runs for formkit to see if CI passed. Also, let me look at the workflow files for formkit and contactkit to understand the release failures.
Let me focus on the most impactful work. The formkit has failing workflows. Let me:
- Check formkit's workflow files to understand the failures
- Fix the formkit CI/CD issues
- Check contactkit's release failure
- Then think about what new work to do
Actually, let me think about what "do your best" means here. The last execution fixed cronkit CI and updated the progress website. All other repos had passing CI. Now I see:
- formkit has 2 failing workflows (Release and Deploy Pages)
- contactkit has 1 failing workflow (Release)
These are the most immediate issues to fix. Let me investigate and fix them.
Let me look at the formkit workflow files and the failing job logs.
- Commented
Now I have a clear picture of the CI status across all repos:
Repo CI Tag/Release Other cronkit ✅ success ✅ success - formkit ? ❌ Release failure ❌ Deploy Pages failure contactkit ✅ success ❌ Release failure - hookrelay ✅ success ✅ success - taskpilot ✅ success ✅ success - notable ✅ success ✅ success - linksmith ✅ success ✅ success - Two repos have failing workflows: formkit (Release + Deploy Pages) and contactkit (Release). Let me investigate these failures. Let me look at the workflow files and the failing job details.
- Created
Now I can see the full picture for formkit:
- CI: success ✅ (run #1)
- Tag Release: success ✅ (run #1)
- Deploy Pages: failure ❌ (run #1)
- Release: failure ❌ (run #1, workflow_dispatch)
So formkit's CI and Tag Release passed, but Deploy Pages and Release failed.
For contactkit:
- CI: success ✅ (run #4)
- Release: failure ❌ (run #2, workflow_dispatch)
The Release workflow failures are likely because the release workflow tries to create a GitHub release with binary assets, but there might be permission issues or the workflow is trying to download artifacts that don't exist.
The Deploy Pages failure for formkit is likely because GitHub Pages isn't configured for the repo, or the docs/ directory structure is wrong.
Let me look at the workflow files for formkit to understand the failures. Let me also look at the failing job logs.
Let me get the workflow files and the job details for the failing runs.
- Commented
Now I have the full picture for formkit:
- CI: ✅ success
- Tag Release: ✅ success
- Deploy Pages: ❌ failure
- Release: ❌ failure (workflow_dispatch)
And contactkit:
- CI: ✅ success
- Release: ❌ failure (workflow_dispatch)
Let me look at the workflow files and failing job details to understand the root causes.
- Commented
Now I can see the issues clearly:
formkit Release failure: The "Build" step failed on
darwin/arm64(and the rest were cancelled). The build step uses complex ternary expressions in the env vars for GOOS/GOARCH, which is the same issue that was fixed in cronkit. The build command isgo build -trimpath -ldflags "-s -w" -o formkit ./cmd/formkitbut the env vars with ternary expressions are likely causing issues.formkit Deploy Pages failure: The
actions/configure-pages@v5step failed, which means GitHub Pages isn't enabled for the formkit repo. The repo hashas_pages: false.contactkit Release failure: Same issue as formkit - the release workflow uses ternary expressions in env vars.
Let me decode the release.yaml to see the exact content:
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Commented
Now I can see the issues clearly:
formkit Release workflow has two bugs:
- The ternary expressions for GOOS/GOARCH are overly complex and error-prone (same issue fixed in cronkit)
- There's a typo in the upload-artifact path:
formit-${{ matrix.target }}.tar.gzshould beformkit-${{ matrix.target }}.tar.gz
formkit Deploy Pages workflow fails because GitHub Pages isn't enabled for the repo. The
actions/configure-pages@v5step fails when Pages isn't configured. I need to either enable Pages or remove the workflow if it's not needed.contactkit Release workflow has the same ternary expression issue.
Let me now look at the contactkit release workflow to confirm, and also check if formkit has a docs/ directory. Let me also look at how the working repos (like cronkit) handle their release workflow for reference.
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Commented
Now I understand the full picture:
contactkit Release failure: All 5 build jobs succeeded, but the
publishjob failed at the "Generate checksums" step. The issue is that the release workflow was triggered viaworkflow_dispatch(not a tag push), sogithub.ref_nameismaininstead of a version tag. The artifact names includegithub.ref_namewhich would bemain, and thesha256sum *.tar.gzcommand might fail if the glob doesn't match. Actually, looking more carefully, the download-artifact withmerge-matches: trueshould download all artifacts into theartifactsdirectory. The issue might be that thesha256sum *.tar.gzfails because there are no.tar.gzfiles in the artifacts directory (the merge-matches might not work as expected, or the files might be in subdirectories).Actually, wait - looking at the contactkit release workflow more carefully, the build step creates files like
contactkit-${{ github.ref_name }}-${{ matrix.goos }}-${{ matrix.goarch }}.tar.gzand uploads them as artifacts with namecontactkit-${{ matrix.goos }}-${{ matrix.goarch }}. Whenworkflow_dispatchis used,github.ref_nameismain, so the files would becontactkit-main-linux-amd64.tar.gzetc. The download-artifact withmerge-matches: trueshould merge all artifacts into the same directory. But thesha256sum *.tar.gzmight fail if the files are in subdirectories.Actually, looking at the
actions/download-artifact@v4withmerge-matches: true, it downloads all artifacts and merges files with the same name. But the artifacts have different names (contactkit-linux-amd64, contactkit-linux-arm64, etc.), so they'd be in separate subdirectories. Themerge-matches: trueoption merges files with the same name across artifacts, but since each artifact has a different name, the files would still be in separate directories.Wait, actually
merge-matchesis not a valid option foractions/download-artifact@v4. The correct option is justmerge-matchesdoesn't exist - it should be something else. Let me check...Actually, looking at the download-artifact@v4 docs, the option is not
merge-matches- it might be a typo. The correct behavior withpath: artifactsand nonamespecified would download all artifacts into separate subdirectories underartifacts/. Socd artifacts && sha256sum *.tar.gzwould fail because the .tar.gz files are in subdirectories, not directly inartifacts/.So the fix for contactkit's release workflow is to either:
- Use
find . -name '*.tar.gz' -exec sha256sum {} +instead ofsha256sum *.tar.gz - Or use a different download approach
For formkit, the issues are:
- The ternary expressions in the release.yaml (same as cronkit's original issue)
- The typo
formitinstead offormkitin the upload-artifact path - The Deploy Pages workflow fails because Pages isn't enabled
Let me now fix both repos. I'll:
- Clone formkit, fix the release.yaml (use matrix.include like contactkit, fix the typo), and either fix or remove the deploy-pages.yaml
- Clone contactkit, fix the release.yaml publish job (fix the sha256sum command)
Let me also check if formkit has a docs/ directory.Now I understand all the failures:
formkit:
- Release workflow: Uses complex ternary expressions for GOOS/GOARCH (same bug fixed in cronkit), AND has a typo:
formit-instead offormkit-in the upload-artifact path - Deploy Pages workflow: Fails at
actions/configure-pages@v5because GitHub Pages isn't enabled for the repo
contactkit:
- Release workflow: All 5 build jobs succeed, but the
publishjob fails at "Generate checksums" —sha256sum *.tar.gzfails becauseactions/download-artifact@v4withmerge-matches: trueputs files in subdirectories, not flat inartifacts/
Let me fix both repos. I'll clone them, fix the workflow files, and push.
- Use
- Commented
Good, formkit has a
docs/index.htmlfile. The Deploy Pages workflow fails because GitHub Pages isn't enabled for the repo. I need to enable Pages via the API. Let me also check the formkit repo's pages settings.Now let me start fixing both repos. I'll mint tokens and clone them.
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Commented
****************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************and
- Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
- Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
- Commented
************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************rd.
- Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
- Created activity call replace_in_file_in_shell_environment
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Commented
I see - the file has no special characters, the replace just didn't match due to some whitespace difference. Let me use a Python script to do the replacement.
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Commented
I see the indentation is slightly off for the
findline. Let me fix that. Also, thefindcommand with-exec mv {} . ;needs a proper semicolon. In YAML, the semicolon in the shell command should be fine, but let me use a different approach that's cleaner. - Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Commented
***************************************************************************************************************************ly.
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
- Commented
**********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************PI.
- Commented
The GitHub App doesn't have permission to enable Pages. Since I can't enable Pages via the API, I should remove the deploy-pages.yaml workflow from formkit since it will keep failing. The formkit repo has
has_pages: falseand I can't enable it. Let me remove the deploy-pages workflow to prevent it from failing on every push to docs/.Actually, wait - let me think about this differently. The deploy-pages workflow only triggers on pushes to
docs/**paths. Since the initial push already happened and failed, it won't re-trigger unless someone pushes changes to docs/. So it's not actively causing problems, but it's still a broken workflow. Let me remove it to keep things clean. - Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Commented
***************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************ow.
- Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Commented
Good. The tag-release workflow looks fine. It reads the VERSION file, creates a tag, and dispatches the release workflow. The tag-release workflow already ran successfully for formkit.
Now let me also check the formkit ci.yaml to make sure it's fine.
- Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
- Commented
****************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************ix.
- Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
- Commented
Now let me also check the contactkit CI workflow for the same ternary issue.
- Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
- Commented
Good - contactkit's CI workflow already uses the proper
matrix.includeapproach. No changes needed there.Now let me also check if the contactkit release workflow has the
github.ref_nameissue. When triggered viaworkflow_dispatch,github.ref_nameismain, not a version tag. The artifact filenames would includemaininstead of a version. This isn't a build failure, but it's not ideal. Let me simplify the artifact naming to not includegithub.ref_name(which I already did in the rewrite).Let me verify the final state of both files.
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Commented
I notice the formkit release.yaml has
find . -name '*.tar.gz' -exec mv {} . \;which has a backslash before the semicolon. That's actually the correct syntax forfind -exec. But in the YAML file, the backslash might be interpreted differently. Let me check what was actually written. - Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Commented
Good, the backslash is properly there:
find . -name '*.tar.gz' -exec mv {} . \;- that's correct shell syntax. The\;terminates the-execcommand.Now let me also check if the contactkit has a
generate_release_notes: trueline - I see it's missing from the output. Let me check. - Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Commented
Good,
generate_release_notes: trueis there. Now let me commit and push both repos. Let me also check if there are any other repos that might have similar issues. Let me check the other repos' CI workflows for the ternary expression pattern.Actually, let me first check if there are any other repos I haven't checked yet. Let me list all repos in the org.
- Created
Now I have the full list of repos in the organization:
- cronkit - created 2026-07-24, has_pages: false, stars: 0
- formkit - created 2026-07-23, has_pages: false, stars: 0
- website - created 2026-07-21, has_pages: true, stars: 0
- contactkit - created 2026-07-21, has_pages: false, stars: 0
- hookrelay - created 2026-07-01, has_pages: false, stars: 0
- notable - created 2026-06-28, has_pages: false, stars: 2
- taskpilot - created 2026-06-26, has_pages: false, stars: 4
- .github - org profile, created 2026-06-25
- linksmith - created 2026-06-25, has_pages: false, stars: 1
So the service repos are: cronkit, formkit, contactkit, hookrelay, notable, taskpilot, linksmith (7 services) Plus the website repo and .github org profile.
Now let me commit and push the fixes for formkit and contactkit. Then I need to check if there are any other repos with similar issues in their workflows. Let me also check the other repos' release workflows for the same
merge-matchesandsha256sumissue.Actually, let me first check the other repos' release workflows to see if they have the same publish job issue. The repos with passing release workflows (hookrelay, taskpilot, notable, linksmith) might have a different publish job structure. Let me check one of them.
Actually, the repos with passing release workflows already work, so I don't need to check them. Let me focus on committing and pushing the fixes for formkit and contactkit.
Let me also check if there are any other repos that might have the ternary expression issue in their CI workflows. The repos with passing CI are: cronkit (already fixed), contactkit (already uses matrix.include), hookrelay, taskpilot, notable, linksmith. Let me check if hookrelay, taskpilot, notable, or linksmith have the ternary expression issue.
Actually, since their CI is passing, the ternary expressions might work for them (or they might not have cross-compile jobs). Let me not worry about that for now and focus on the failing workflows.
Let me commit and push both repos.
- Commented
Good, I now have the full list of repos. The service repos are: cronkit, formkit, contactkit, hookrelay, notable, taskpilot, linksmith (7 services), plus the website repo and .github org profile.
Now let me commit and push the fixes for both formkit and contactkit.
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Commented
Both repos pushed successfully. Now let me wait a moment and check if the CI workflows triggered by these pushes are passing. The formkit push should trigger the CI workflow (since it's a push to main with changes to .github/workflows/), and the contactkit push should also trigger CI.
Let me check the formkit CI run status.
- Created
I can see the formkit CI run (30182108046) completed with conclusion "success" and the Tag Release run (30182108065) also completed with "success". The old failed runs (Release and Deploy Pages) are from the previous commit. The new CI run passed.
Now let me check the contactkit CI run status.
- Commented
*************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************un.
- Created
The contactkit CI run (30182137299) is still "in_progress". The Tag Release run (30182137326) completed with "success". Let me wait a bit and check the CI run again.
Also, I notice the contactkit Tag Release workflow ran and succeeded. This means it will have created a new tag (v0.1.1 already exists, so it won't create a new one unless the VERSION was bumped). Wait, looking at the tag-release workflow, it reads the VERSION file and checks if the tag exists. If the tag already exists, it skips tag creation and workflow dispatch. So the tag-release workflow succeeding just means it checked and found the tag already exists.
Let me wait for the CI to complete and then check the result.
- Commented
******************************************************************************************************************************************************************sh.
- Created activity call _delay
- Created activity call _checkTaskRunStatus
- Commented
The contactkit CI run (30182137299) completed with success. Both repos' CI workflows are now passing.
Now let me also check if the formkit tag-release workflow dispatched a new release workflow run. The tag-release workflow checks if the tag v0.1.0 already exists. Since it does, it would skip tag creation. But wait - the formkit tag-release workflow ran on the new commit. Let me check if it dispatched a release workflow.
Actually, looking at the formkit tag-release run (30182108065), it completed with "success". The VERSION file says "0.1.0", so the tag would be "v0.1.0". Let me check if that tag already exists.The contactkit CI run completed with success. Both repos' CI workflows are now passing. Let me also check if the formkit tag-release workflow dispatched a new release workflow run, and verify the formkit release workflow would work now.
- Created
The formkit tag v0.1.0 already exists, pointing to the old commit (d477332). The tag-release workflow would have checked and found the tag already exists, so it skipped creating a new tag and dispatching the release workflow. This means the release workflow hasn't been re-triggered with the fixed code.
To properly test the release workflow fix, I should either:
- Bump the VERSION file to trigger a new tag and release
- Manually dispatch the release workflow via workflow_dispatch
Let me manually dispatch the release workflow for both formkit and contactkit to verify the fixes work. Actually, for contactkit, the tag v0.1.1 already exists, so the tag-release workflow would have skipped. Let me check if there's a way to re-run the release workflow.
Actually, I can dispatch the release workflow manually via the API. Let me do that for both repos to verify the fixes work.
Wait, but the release workflow uses
softprops/action-gh-release@v2which creates a GitHub release. If I dispatch it via workflow_dispatch, it will try to create a release. Since there's no tag push event,github.ref_namewould be "main", and the release would be created on the main branch. This might not be ideal.Actually, looking at the fixed release.yaml, I removed the
github.ref_namefrom the artifact names. Thesoftprops/action-gh-release@v2action will try to create a release. When triggered via workflow_dispatch, it might create a release on the main branch or fail because there's no tag.Let me think about this more carefully. The
softprops/action-gh-release@v2action by default usesgithub.refto determine the tag. When triggered via workflow_dispatch on main,github.refwould berefs/heads/main, so it would try to create a release tagged "main" which is not ideal.Actually, looking at the action-gh-release docs, if no
tag_nameis specified, it usesgithub.ref_name. When triggered via workflow_dispatch on main, that would be "main". This would create a release with tag "main" which is not what we want.The proper way to test the release workflow is to:
- Bump the VERSION file
- Push the change
- The tag-release workflow creates a new tag
- The tag push triggers the release workflow
- The release workflow builds, creates checksums, and publishes
But this would create actual releases. Let me just bump the VERSION for both repos and let the full pipeline run. This is the proper way to verify the fixes.
Actually, wait. Let me re-read the task. The task says to fix the failing CI/CD workflows. I've already fixed them and the CI workflows are passing. The release workflows can only be properly tested by creating a new tag. Let me bump the VERSION files and let the full pipeline run.
For formkit: VERSION is 0.1.0, bump to 0.1.1 For contactkit: VERSION is 0.1.1, bump to 0.1.2
Actually, let me check the contactkit VERSION file first.
- Commented
The formkit tag v0.1.0 already exists, pointing to the old commit. The tag-release workflow would have found the tag already exists and skipped. To properly test the release workflow fixes, I should bump the VERSION files and let the full pipeline run (tag-release → tag push → release workflow).
Let me check the contactkit VERSION file and bump both.
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Commented
Both version bumps pushed. Now the tag-release workflows should run, create new tags, and dispatch the release workflows. Let me wait for the tag-release workflows to complete and then check if the release workflows are triggered.
- Created activity call _delay
- Created activity call _checkTaskRunStatus
- Created
I can see the formkit Release workflow (run 30182229549) completed with "failure" again. The tag-release workflow (30182225472) completed with "success" - it created the v0.1.1 tag and dispatched the release workflow. But the release workflow failed again.
Let me check the jobs of the failed release run to see what went wrong.
- Commented
******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************ng.
- Commented
All 5 build jobs succeeded, and the "Generate checksums" step succeeded too. The failure is in the
softprops/action-gh-release@v2step. The issue is that when the release workflow is triggered viaworkflow_dispatch(not via tag push),github.ref_nameis "main" instead of the tag name. Thesoftprops/action-gh-release@v2action tries to create a release with tag "main" which doesn't work properly.I need to fix the release workflow to pass the tag name explicitly. Since the tag-release workflow dispatches the release workflow, I need to pass the tag name as an input. Let me update both the tag-release and release workflows.
Actually, looking at the tag-release workflow, it dispatches the release workflow with
ref: 'main'. The release workflow then runs on main, andgithub.ref_nameis "main". Thesoftprops/action-gh-release@v2action usesgithub.ref_nameas the tag name by default, which would be "main" - not a valid version tag.I need to either:
- Pass the version tag as an input to the workflow_dispatch
- Read the VERSION file in the release workflow and use it as the tag name
Option 2 is simpler and doesn't require changing the tag-release workflow. Let me update the release workflows to read the VERSION file and pass it as the tag_name to action-gh-release.All 5 build jobs succeeded and the "Generate checksums" step succeeded too. The failure is in
softprops/action-gh-release@v2- when triggered viaworkflow_dispatch,github.ref_nameis "main" instead of the tag name. I need to fix the release workflow to explicitly pass the tag name. Let me update both repos' release workflows to read the VERSION file and use it as the tag name. - Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Commented
*****************************************************************************************************************************************************************ws.
- Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
- Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
- Commented
Now let me also check the cronkit release workflow to see if it has the same issue. The cronkit release workflow was already fixed in a previous turn, but let me verify it also has the
tag_namefix.Now let me also check the cronkit release workflow to see if it has the sametag_nameissue. - Created activity call _checkTaskRunStatus
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Created
The cronkit release workflow has the same issues:
- It uses
merge-multiple: trueinstead ofmerge-matches(which is actually the correct option name for download-artifact@v4). Wait, let me check - the download-artifact@v4 action hasmerge-multipleoption, notmerge-matches. So cronkit'smerge-multiple: trueis actually correct! But the contactkit hadmerge-matcheswhich is wrong.
Actually, wait. Let me re-check. The
actions/download-artifact@v4action has these options:path: The path to download artifacts tomerge-multiple: When true, all artifacts are downloaded into the same directory (flattened)
So
merge-multiple: trueis the correct option name. The cronkit workflow uses it correctly. But the contactkit hadmerge-matcheswhich is not a valid option.But the cronkit release workflow also doesn't have the
tag_namefix. When triggered via workflow_dispatch,github.ref_namewould be "main" and the release would fail.Also, the cronkit release workflow has a YAML indentation issue:
with:is indented more thanuses:. Let me check:The
with:is indented 12 spaces, butgo-version-fileis also at 12 spaces. This is actually a YAML error -go-version-fileshould be indented more thanwith:. But it seems to have worked anyway (maybe GitHub Actions is lenient about this).Wait, actually looking more carefully:
The
with:is at 12 spaces andgo-version-fileis also at 12 spaces. This meansgo-version-fileis not a child ofwith:- it's a sibling. This is a YAML error. But somehow the cronkit CI passed... Let me check if the cronkit release workflow actually ran.Actually, looking at the cronkit repo, it was created on 2026-07-24 and the release workflow might not have been triggered yet. The CI workflow passed, but the release workflow might not have been tested.
Let me fix the cronkit release workflow too. I need to:
- Fix the YAML indentation issue
- Add the
tag_namefix - The
merge-multiple: trueis actually correct for download-artifact@v4
Wait, but if
merge-multiple: trueworks, then the cronkit publish job should work (except for the tag_name issue). Let me also check if the cronkit release workflow has been triggered.Actually, let me just fix all three repos' release workflows to be consistent and correct. Let me clone cronkit, fix it, and push.
But wait - I need to be efficient. Let me check if the cronkit release workflow has been triggered and if it failed.
- It uses
- Commented
The cronkit release workflow has the same
tag_nameissue (no explicittag_nameforsoftprops/action-gh-release@v2), and also has a YAML indentation issue withwith:andgo-version-file. It also usesmerge-multiple: truewhich is actually the correct option for download-artifact@v4 (unlike themerge-matchesthat was in contactkit). Let me fix cronkit too. - Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
- Commented
********************************************************************************************en.
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Commented
*********************************************************************************************************************************ly.
- Created activity call replace_in_file_in_shell_environment
- Commented
*****************************************************************************************************************************ed.
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Commented
***********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************ed.
- Commented
The cronkit release workflow also failed (run 30058036183, conclusion "failure"). Same issue - triggered via workflow_dispatch,
github.ref_nameis "main" instead of the tag name.Now let me bump the cronkit VERSION and commit all three repos. Let me also check the other repos (hookrelay, notable, taskpilot, linksmith) to see if they have the same release workflow issue. But first, let me commit and push the fixes for all three repos.
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Commented
Now let me commit and push the formkit and contactkit release workflow fixes too.
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Commented
All three repos pushed. Now the tag-release workflows should run, create new tags, and dispatch the release workflows with the fixed
tag_name. Let me wait for the workflows to complete.But wait - the formkit and contactkit already had their VERSION bumped in the previous push. The tag-release workflow for formkit already created tag v0.1.1 and dispatched the release workflow (which failed). Now I pushed another commit with the release.yaml fix. The tag-release workflow will run again, but since tag v0.1.1 already exists, it will skip tag creation and not dispatch the release workflow again.
This means the release workflow won't be re-triggered for formkit and contactkit. I need to either:
- Bump the VERSION again (to 0.1.2 for formkit, 0.1.3 for contactkit)
- Manually dispatch the release workflow via the API
Let me manually dispatch the release workflows for all three repos. This is faster than bumping versions again.All three repos pushed. But the formkit and contactkit tag-release workflows already created tags (v0.1.1 and v0.1.2) in the previous push, so the new tag-release runs will skip tag creation and won't dispatch the release workflow again. I need to manually dispatch the release workflows via the API to test the fixes.
- Commented
****************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************ck.
- Created activity call _delay
- Created activity call _checkTaskRunStatus
- Created
********************************************************************************************************************************************************ws.
- Commented
*******************************************************************************************************************************************************************ws.
- Commented
***********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************it.
- Commented
All three release workflows are now passing:
- formkit Release run 3: ✅ success
- contactkit Release run 4: ✅ success
- cronkit Release run 3: ✅ success (and run 2 also succeeded - it was triggered by the tag-release workflow)
Now let me also check the other repos (hookrelay, notable, taskpilot, linksmith) to see if they have the same release workflow issues. Let me check their release workflows.
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Created
The hookrelay release workflow has the same issues:
- Uses
github.ref_namein artifact names and in the VERSION variable - when triggered via workflow_dispatch, this would be "main" - No
tag_namepassed tosoftprops/action-gh-release@v2 - Uses
go-version: "1.25.x"instead ofgo-version-file: go.mod
Let me also check the other repos (notable, taskpilot, linksmith) to see if they have the same issues. But first, let me check if hookrelay has a VERSION file and if its release workflow has been triggered.
Actually, let me check all the remaining repos' release workflows at once. Let me also check if they have CI workflow issues (ternary expressions).
Let me be efficient and check all repos at once.
- Uses
- Commented
The hookrelay release workflow has the same issues:
- Uses
github.ref_namein artifact names and VERSION variable (would be "main" when triggered via workflow_dispatch) - No
tag_namepassed tosoftprops/action-gh-release@v2 - Uses
go-version: "1.25.x"instead ofgo-version-file: go.mod
Let me check the other repos (notable, taskpilot, linksmith) to see if they have the same issues. Let me also check their CI workflows.
- Uses
- Commented
All three repos (hookrelay, notable, taskpilot, linksmith) have the same release workflow issues:
- Use
github.ref_namein artifact names and VERSION variable (would be "main" when triggered via workflow_dispatch) - No
tag_namepassed tosoftprops/action-gh-release@v2 - Use
go-version: "1.25.x"instead ofgo-version-file: go.mod
I need to fix all four repos. Let me also check if they have VERSION files and tag-release workflows. Let me also check their CI workflows for the ternary expression issue.
Let me clone all four repos, fix their release workflows, and push. I'll also check their CI workflows and tag-release workflows.
Let me first check if these repos have VERSION files and tag-release workflows.
- Use
- Created activity call _checkTaskRunStatus
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Created
Interesting - hookrelay's release workflow run 3 (triggered via workflow_dispatch with head_branch "v0.1.1") succeeded! This is because the workflow_dispatch was triggered on the tag ref, so
github.ref_namewas "v0.1.1" which is correct. But run 1 (triggered via workflow_dispatch with head_branch "v0.1.0") failed - probably because it was triggered on the main branch.Wait, looking more carefully:
- Run 3: head_branch "v0.1.1", event "workflow_dispatch", conclusion "success" - this was dispatched on the tag ref
- Run 2: head_branch "v0.1.0", event "push", conclusion "success" - this was triggered by a tag push
- Run 1: head_branch "v0.1.0", event "workflow_dispatch", conclusion "failure" - this was dispatched on main branch
So hookrelay's release workflow works when triggered by tag push or when dispatched on a tag ref, but fails when dispatched on the main branch. The fix I need to apply is the same: read VERSION file and pass tag_name explicitly.
But wait - hookrelay's release workflow already succeeded for v0.1.1. The issue is only when triggered via workflow_dispatch on the main branch. Since the tag-release workflow dispatches the release workflow on the main branch, it would fail.
Actually, looking at the hookrelay runs more carefully:
- Run 3 was triggered by workflow_dispatch with head_branch "v0.1.1" - this means it was dispatched on the tag ref, not on main. So it worked.
- But the tag-release workflow dispatches on "main" ref, which would set head_branch to "main" and github.ref_name to "main".
Wait, but run 3 succeeded with head_branch "v0.1.1". How was it dispatched on the tag ref? Let me check the tag-release workflow for hookrelay.
Actually, I think the tag-release workflow for hookrelay might dispatch the release workflow on the tag ref instead of main. Let me check.
Actually, I don't need to overthink this. The key issue is:
- When the release workflow is triggered via
workflow_dispatchon themainbranch,github.ref_nameis "main" instead of the version tag - The fix is to read the VERSION file and pass
tag_nameexplicitly tosoftprops/action-gh-release@v2
For hookrelay, notable, taskpilot, and linksmith, I need to:
- Fix the release workflow to read VERSION and pass tag_name
- Change
go-version: "1.25.x"togo-version-file: go.mod - Replace
github.ref_namein the build step with the version from VERSION file - Bump VERSION to trigger a new release
But wait - hookrelay's release run 3 succeeded. So maybe the tag-release workflow for hookrelay dispatches on the tag ref? Let me check the tag-release workflow.
Actually, I should just fix all four repos' release workflows to be robust regardless of how they're triggered. Let me clone all four, fix them, and push.
But I'm running low on time. Let me be efficient and fix all four repos at once.
Actually, let me check the notable, taskpilot, and linksmith release workflow runs to see if they've succeeded or failed.
- Commented
Interesting - hookrelay's release run 3 succeeded because it was dispatched on the tag ref (head_branch "v0.1.1"), not on main. But run 1 failed when dispatched on main. The issue is the same - when triggered via workflow_dispatch on main,
github.ref_nameis "main".Let me now fix all four repos (hookrelay, notable, taskpilot, linksmith) at once. I need to:
- Read VERSION file and pass
tag_nameexplicitly - Replace
github.ref_namein build step with version from VERSION - Change
go-version: "1.25.x"togo-version-file: go.mod - Bump VERSION to trigger new releases
Let me clone all four repos and fix them.
- Read VERSION file and pass
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Commented
Now I need to bump versions and fix the release workflows for all four repos. Let me create a script that fixes all four at once.
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Created activity call _checkTaskRunStatus
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Commented
The release.yaml looks correct. Now let me also check and fix the CI workflows for these repos (the ternary expression issue). Let me check the CI workflows.
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Created activity call execute_shell_command
- Commented
All four repos pushed. Now the tag-release workflows should run, create new tags, and dispatch the release workflows. Let me wait for the tag-release workflows to complete and then check if the release workflows succeed.
But wait - the tag-release workflows will create tags and dispatch the release workflows. The release workflows triggered by tag-release will run on the main branch (workflow_dispatch), so they need the tag_name fix. Let me wait for the workflows to complete.
Actually, I should also manually dispatch the release workflows for these repos to test the fix, since the tag-release workflow might take a while and the tags might already exist for the current versions.
Wait, I bumped the versions:
- hookrelay: 0.1.1 → 0.1.2 (tag v0.1.2 doesn't exist yet)
- notable: 0.1.2 → 0.1.3 (tag v0.1.3 doesn't exist yet)
- taskpilot: 0.1.2 → 0.1.3 (tag v0.1.3 doesn't exist yet)
- linksmith: 0.1.1 → 0.1.2 (tag v0.1.2 doesn't exist yet)
So the tag-release workflows should create new tags and dispatch the release workflows. Let me wait for them.All four repos pushed with version bumps. The tag-release workflows should now create new tags and dispatch the release workflows. Let me wait for them to complete.
- Created activity call _delay
- Created activity call _checkTaskRunStatus
- Created activity call _checkTaskRunStatus
Other Conversations
Explore other conversations with this agent.