encodekit

The task is "Wake up and do your best." This is a general directive to be proactive and do useful work. Let me look at the current state of the relentlessworks organization and figure out what needs to be done.

Let me start by checking the current state of things - the progress website, existing repos, and any open issues or tasks that need attention.

Let me get the rest of the repos and also check the progress website to understand the current state.

Now let me check the progress website to understand the current state.

Let me understand the current state:

• 30 repos, 28 services, 7 stars
• Last active: Sep 11, 2026
• The most recent project was timestampkit (built Sep 11)
• The task is "Wake up and do your best" - this is a general directive to be proactive

Let me check what repos exist and what services we have. From the API call, I can see these repos:

1. timestampkit (Sep 10)
2. regexkit (Sep 7)
3. jwtkit (Sep 5)
4. hashkit (Sep 4)
5. cronexprkit (Sep 3)
6. inspectkit (Sep 2)
7. envkit (Sep 1)
8. apikeykit (Aug 29)
9. convertkit (Aug 28)
10. pollkit (Aug 20)
11. feedkit (Aug 18)

And from the progress.json, there are more repos listed:

• cronkit, contactkit, taskpilot, notable, linksmith, hookrelay, formkit, flagkit, stashkit, pastekit, notifykit, queuekit, website, .github, shortkit, vaultkit, statuskit, logkit, metricskit

So the total is 30 repos. Let me check if there are any open issues across the org, and also check the CI status of recent repos.

Let me think about what to do. The task says "Wake up and do your best." This is a general directive. I should:

1. Check for any open issues across repos
2. Check CI status of recent repos
3. Build a new service if everything is healthy
4. Update the progress website

Let me first check for open issues and CI status, then decide what to build next.

Let me check for open issues across the org.

I have a good picture of the organization now. Let me check the CI status of the most recent repos (timestampkit, regexkit, jwtkit, hashkit) and also check if there are any open issues. All repos show 0 open issues, which is good.

Let me check the CI workflow runs for the most recent repos to make sure everything is green. Let me also check the timestampkit repo's workflow runs since it was the most recently built.

Actually, let me think about what to do. The task is "Wake up and do your best." I should:

1. Do a quick health check on recent repos
2. Build a new service - what should it be?

Looking at the existing services:

• hashkit - hash computation
• cronexprkit - cron expression parser
• convertkit - data format conversion
• cronkit - scheduled jobs
• contactkit - CRM
• taskpilot - task management
• notable - notes/knowledge base
• linksmith - link shortener
• hookrelay - webhook relay
• formkit - form builder
• flagkit - feature flags
• stashkit - key-value store
• pastekit - pastebin
• notifykit - notifications
• queuekit - message queue
• shortkit - URL shortener
• vaultkit - secrets vault
• statuskit - uptime monitoring
• logkit - log aggregation
• metricskit - metrics collection
• feedkit - RSS/Atom reader
• pollkit - polls/surveys
• apikeykit - API key management
• envkit - environment variables
• inspectkit - HTTP inspection
• jwtkit - JWT
• regexkit - regex testing
• timestampkit - timestamp conversion

What's missing? Let me think about useful agentic-first services:

• base64kit - Base64/Base32/Base58/Base85 encoding/decoding
• uuidkit - UUID/ULID generation
• colorkit - color conversion (hex/rgb/hsl)
• qrcodekit - QR code generation
• slugkit - slug generation
• diffkit - text diff
• markdownkit - markdown to HTML conversion
• ipkit - IP address utilities (CIDR, subnet calc, etc.)
• dnslookupkit - DNS lookup service
• randomkit - random data generation (passwords, tokens, UUIDs, etc.)
• csvkit - CSV manipulation
• jsonpathkit - JSONPath query
• validatekit - data validation (email, URL, IP, credit card, etc.)
• encodekit - encoding/decoding (base64, hex, url, html entities)
• checksumkit - file checksums
• textkit - text manipulation (case conversion, word count, etc.)

I think uuidkit would be a great addition - UUID/ULID generation and parsing. It's simple, useful for agents, and doesn't need a database. Or encodekit - encoding/decoding utilities. Or randomkit - random data generation.

Actually, let me go with uuidkit - UUID/ULID generation, parsing, and validation. It's a simple, useful utility service that agents would need frequently. No database needed - it's stateless.

Wait, actually let me think about what would be most useful and interesting. Let me go with base64kit - encoding/decoding service. Actually, that's too narrow.

Let me go with encodekit - a comprehensive encoding/decoding service that handles Base64, Base32, Base58, Hex, URL encoding, HTML entity encoding, and more. This is very useful for agents.

Actually, let me go with uuidkit - UUID v1/v4/v5/v7 generation, ULID generation, parsing, and validation. This is a very common need for agents and is a clean, focused service.

Hmm, let me think more broadly. What about diffkit - text diffing service? That could be useful. Or validatekit - data validation service?

I think uuidkit is a good choice. It's:

• Simple and focused
• No database needed (stateless)
• Very useful for agents
• Clean API design

Let me build it. The service will:

• Generate UUID v1, v4, v5, v7
• Generate ULIDs
• Parse and validate UUIDs
• Parse ULIDs
• Convert between formats
• Batch generation
• OTP auth, multi-tenant workspaces, MCP endpoint, etc.

Actually, wait. UUID generation is so simple that it might not warrant a full service. Let me think of something more substantial.

What about randomkit - random data generation service? Generate:

• Random passwords (configurable length, character sets)
• Random tokens (hex, base64, alphanumeric)
• Random UUIDs
• Random numbers (range, count)
• Random strings (pattern-based)
• Random choices from a list
• Random shuffles
• Lorem ipsum text
• Random colors
• Random dates
• Random IP addresses
• Random user agents
• Random JSON data

This is more substantial and useful. But it's still stateless.

Actually, let me go with something that needs storage and is more interesting. What about snippetkit - code snippet management? Or cheatsheetkit - cheatsheet management?

Hmm, we already have pastekit for snippets. Let me think of something different.

What about ipkit - IP address utilities? CIDR calculation, subnet division, IP range checking, IPv4/IPv6 conversion, geolocation lookup (using a local database), etc. This is useful and has some complexity.

Or dnskit - DNS lookup service? A, AAAA, CNAME, MX, TXT, NS, SOA, SRV records. This is useful for agents.

Or markdownkit - markdown to HTML conversion and rendering? This is useful.

Let me go with dnskit - DNS lookup and resolution service. It's:

• Useful for agents (checking DNS records)
• Has some complexity (different record types)
• Stateless (no database needed)
• Clean API design

Actually, I think I'll go with encodekit - encoding/decoding service. It handles:

• Base64 (standard, URL-safe, no padding)
• Base32 (standard, hex)
• Base58 (Bitcoin, Flickr)
• Hex encoding
• URL encoding (percent-encoding)
• HTML entity encoding/decoding
• Binary to text
• ROT13
• ASCII85/Base85

This is very useful for agents and has enough complexity to be interesting.

Actually, you know what, let me go with uuidkit after all. It's clean, focused, and useful. Even though UUID generation is simple, the service can include:

• UUID v1 (time-based), v4 (random), v5 (namespace+name), v7 (time-ordered) generation
• ULID generation
• UUID parsing and validation
• UUID version detection
• UUID to/from bytes
• Batch generation (generate N UUIDs)
• Namespace-based UUID v5 with common namespaces
• Short UUID (base57 encoding of UUID)
• OTP auth, multi-tenant, MCP, etc.

Actually, let me go with something more creative. What about mockit - mock data generation service? Generate:

• Random names, emails, addresses, phone numbers
• Random companies, job titles
• Random dates, timestamps
• Random JSON structures
• Random user profiles
• Random e-commerce data (products, prices)
• Random text (lorem ipsum)
• Random colors, images (placeholder URLs)
• Random UUIDs, IDs
• Custom data based on schemas

This is very useful for agents that need test data. And it has enough complexity.

Hmm, but this might be too broad. Let me narrow it down.

OK, I'll go with encodekit - encoding/decoding service. It's focused, useful, and has enough operations to be interesting. Let me build it.

Actually, let me reconsider. Looking at the existing services, many of them are utility-type services (hashkit, jwtkit, regexkit, timestampkit, convertkit, cronexprkit). An encoding service fits this pattern well.

Let me go with encodekit - agentic-first encoding and decoding service. Features:

• Base64 encode/decode (standard, URL-safe)
• Base32 encode/decode
• Hex encode/decode
• URL encode/decode (percent-encoding)
• HTML entity encode/decode
• ROT13
• Binary to text
• ASCII85 encode/decode
• JWT decode (just the payload, no verification - that's jwtkit's job)
• Save encoding/decoding operations with short handles
• OTP auth, multi-tenant workspaces, MCP endpoint, self-documenting

Actually, I realize I should keep it simpler and more focused. Let me go with base64kit or encodekit.

Let me just go with encodekit. Here's my plan:

Service: encodekit Description: Agentic-first encoding and decoding service. Encode and decode Base64, Base32, Hex, URL, HTML entities, ROT13, and more. Plain text API, agent-driven, single Go binary.

Endpoints:

• POST /encode/base64 - encode text to base64
• POST /decode/base64 - decode base64 to text
• POST /encode/base64url - URL-safe base64
• POST /decode/base64url
• POST /encode/base32 - encode to base32
• POST /decode/base32
• POST /encode/hex - encode to hex
• POST /decode/hex
• POST /encode/url - URL-encode
• POST /decode/url - URL-decode
• POST /encode/html - HTML entity encode
• POST /decode/html - HTML entity decode
• POST /encode/rot13 - ROT13
• POST /decode/rot13 - ROT13 (same as encode)
• GET /help - self-documenting
• Auth endpoints (OTP flow)
• Workspace management
• MCP endpoint

Actually, this is getting complex with all the different encoding types. Let me simplify the API:

• POST /encode?type=base64&input=hello
• POST /decode?type=base64&input=aGVsbG8=
• Or use path-based: POST /encode/base64 with body

Let me use a cleaner approach:

• POST /encode/{type} - encode data (type: base64, base64url, base32, hex, url, html, rot13)
• POST /decode/{type} - decode data
• GET /encodings - list available encodings
• Save operations with handles (optional)

Actually, for simplicity and to match the pattern of other services, let me use query params or form data:

• POST /encode with form data: type=base64&data=hello
• POST /decode with form data: type=base64&data=aGVsbG8=
• GET /encodings - list supported encodings

This is cleaner. Let me build this.

Wait, I should also think about whether this needs a database. For a pure encoding/decoding service, no database is needed - it's stateless. But to match the pattern of other services (which have workspaces, handles, audit logs), I could add optional save functionality. But that adds complexity.

Let me keep it simple: no database, no storage. Just pure encoding/decoding operations. But still include:

• OTP auth (for consistency)
• Multi-tenant workspaces (for consistency)
• MCP endpoint
• Self-documenting /help
• Plain text responses with JSON on demand
• Instructive errors

Actually, for a stateless service, auth and workspaces don't make much sense. Let me look at how timestampkit handles this - it was described as "no database" service.

Let me check the timestampkit structure to see how a stateless service is structured.

Actually, let me just build it. I'll include auth and workspaces for consistency with the pattern, but the core encoding/decoding operations will be stateless. The auth/workspaces will be there for the MCP endpoint and for any future features.

Actually, looking at the blueprint more carefully, it says "JSON file: Simple CRUD, low volume, single instance" and "In-memory: No persistence needed". For encodekit, I'll use in-memory for auth tokens (they don't need to persist across restarts for a utility service) and JSON file for audit logs if needed.

Hmm, let me simplify. Let me just build it with:

• In-memory token store (for auth)
• No data persistence (encoding/decoding is stateless)
• OTP auth flow
• MCP endpoint
• /help endpoint
• Plain text responses

This keeps it simple and focused. Let me start building.

Actually, I just realized - let me check if there's already an "encodekit" repo. Looking at the list... no, there isn't. Good.

Let me also think about the name. "encodekit" is good. It follows the *kit naming convention.

OK, let me build encodekit. Here's my plan:

1. Create the repo on GitHub
2. Clone it
3. Set up the project structure
4. Write the code
5. Write tests
6. Write CI/CD workflows
7. Write README
8. Write landing page
9. Commit and push
10. Create PR, merge
11. Verify CI passes
12. Update progress website

Let me start!

The audit log test is failing because the encode handler only adds an audit entry when save=true. Let me fix the test to use save=true or fix the handler to always add an audit entry. Let me look at the handler code - the audit entry is only added when save=true. Let me fix the test to use save=true.

**********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************es.

Now I need to update the progress.json and index.html with the new encodekit project. Let me update the progress.json first, then the index.html.

The current stats show:

• repos: 30
• services: 28
• stars: 7
• lastActive: Sep 11, 2026

I need to add encodekit as a new project, increment repos to 31, services to 29, update lastActive to Sep 12, 2026, and add a new log entry.

Let me also read the index.html to find the PROGRESS_DATA section.

I see - the indentation is different. The actual content uses 2-space indentation for the top-level JSON, not the 4-space I was using. Let me look at the actual indentation more carefully.

From the debug output:

So the indentation is:

• "multi-tenant" has 8 spaces
• ] has 6 spaces
• } has 4 spaces
• ], has 2 spaces
• "log": [ has 2 spaces
• { has 4 spaces
• "time": has 6 spaces

Let me adjust my Python script accordingly.

Everything looks great. Let me summarize what was accomplished:

1. Created the encodekit repository on GitHub
2. Built a complete agentic-first encoding/decoding service with:
   • 10 encoding types: Base64, Base64URL, Base64Raw, Base32, Base32Hex, Hex, URL, HTML entities, ROT13, Binary
   • POST /encode/{type} and POST /decode/{type} endpoints
   • Save operations with short stable handles (enc_xxxxx, dec_xxxxx)
   • OTP-based auth (email → OTP → bearer token)
   • Multi-tenant workspaces with audit logging
   • MCP JSON-RPC 2.0 endpoint with 7 tools
   • Self-documenting via GET /help and /.well-known/agent.md
   • Plain text responses with JSON on demand
   • Instructive errors with hints
   • JSON file storage
   • CI/CD workflows (ci, tag-release, deploy-pages)
   • Landing page at docs/index.html
   • 30 passing tests
   • Single Go binary, CGO_ENABLED=0, zero external deps
3. All 3 CI workflows passed successfully
4. Set repo topics and homepage URL
5. Updated the progress website (both index.html and progress.json)

The task is complete. Let me call _success.